- #Apple snow leopard vs lion mac os x#
- #Apple snow leopard vs lion update#
- #Apple snow leopard vs lion Patch#
- #Apple snow leopard vs lion software#
- #Apple snow leopard vs lion code#
#Apple snow leopard vs lion code#
Plugins such as Flash and Java are vigorously analysed by crooks in the hope that they’ll find a way to trick them into downloading program code without permission. If you really want to run with the outdated plugin, HT5271 tells you how.īut you really shouldn’t.
#Apple snow leopard vs lion update#
When you update your Flash version – an update Apple’s own processes obviously can’t control – then the plugin gets reactivated. New to Safari 5.1.7 is a feature which automatically turns off the Adobe Flash plugin inside your browser if it goes out of date.
#Apple snow leopard vs lion Patch#
The security fixes – which include a patch for the remote code execution issue addressed two days ago in iOS 5.1.1 – are at HT5282. This is nice! The notification is at DL1531 and some implementational detail is at HT5271.
So if you’re on 10.6.8, you get this one separately. This patch is part of the OS X Lion point update to 10.7.4, but isn’t included in the 2012-002 update pack for Snow Leopard users. Apple has chosen to document them in one place, for a total of 26 vulnerabilities patched in 19 system components.) (Some of the vulnerabilities listed in HT5281 apply only to Lion – such as the FileVault password logging fault. This is Snow Leopard’s equivalent of the 10.7.4 update. Of course, passwords should never be stored in plaintext, so this was a monster-sized blunder. This caused OS X Lion to record your personal password in its log file, where others could retrieve it.
#Apple snow leopard vs lion software#
Apple inadvertently shipped a version of FileVault – the software which seamlessly encrypts your home folder – with a debugging option turned on. Notably, the 10.7.4 update fixes the recently-discovered FileVault flaw. There are vulnerabilities leading to information leakage (other people can look at data they’re not supposed to see, up to and including raw passwords), escalation of privilege (non-admin users can get administrative access they’re not supposed to have), and remote code execution (untrusted external content, such as a web page, can run software on your Mac without warning). These include issues at Bronze, Silver and Gold medal levels of insecurity. This update patches numerous vulnerabilities. The blurb is at DL1525 the 40,000-foot overview is at HT5167 and the all-important security details are at HT5281. But to me, Lion wasn't a step forward, it was a step sideways and I don't recommend Lion to anyone who asks my opinion.Hot on the heels of the iOS 5.1.1 release, Apple has pumped out a raft of security updates for Snow Leopard (OS X 10.6) and Lion (OS X 10.7) users. Does that mean I will get left behind? Possibly. like others, have started questioning what is going on and wish Apple would give us the OPTION of doing it the old way. I don't intend to debate whether Apple is right or wrong. But if you want to do it a slightly different way, heaven help you because Apple doesn't give you the option. If you do it the way Apple wants you too, then all is fine. It is something I am seeing more and more in Apple products. There are things in Lion that "fixed what wasn't broken". I have gone from OS9 all the way to Lion on the Mac side, and from DOS 3.0 all the way to Windows 7 on the PC side, and liked all the changes. And I find that Lion is changing the whole paradigm of how things should be done. Than being said, the things I do on the puter I have gotten used to doing a certain way. Among other things, it has its own maintenance scripts that run silently in the background on a daily, weekly and monthly basis, without user intervention.
#Apple snow leopard vs lion mac os x#
Mac OS X does a good job of taking care of itself, without the need for 3rd party software. Many of these tasks should only be done selectively to troubleshoot specific problems, not en masse as routine maintenance. Some of these apps delete caches, which can hurt performance, rather than help it, since more system resources are used and performance suffers while each cache is being rebuilt. These apps will not make your Mac run faster or more efficiently, since having stuff stored on a drive does not impact performance, unless you're running out of drive space.
Some remove files/folders or unused languages or architectures, which does nothing more than free up some drive space, with the risk of deleting something important in the process. Click to expand.You don't need "cleaner" or "maintenance" apps like MacKeeper to keep your Mac running well, and some of these apps can do more harm than good.